WELCOME

There was always a chance that the tweet would go

July 22, 2018 by Elizabeth Duran

There was always a chance that the tweet would go viral, but Nunes' actions could have far-reaching consequences for the conservative movement. It could send the party's agenda into the dustbin of history, giving it an even more favorable image than it did before Nunes' tweet.

One can only wonder how this could happen. We don't have a political party whose leadership is a little too conservative, too conservative, or too conservative to be the target of the Streisand Effect. The truth is, it's not too late to fix the issue.

And that's a shame — not only because the "pain, insult, embarrassment, emotional distress and mental suffering" that the Streisand Effect has created for conservatives doesn't seem to make sense to many conservatives, but also because they're afraid of being perceived as a hypocrite. It's a shame that, once again, Nunes has to be punished by his own party for taking a stand on a bigoted issue.

(Correction: This post originally stated that Devin Nunes used the law to attack the DNC, rather than his own party. This has been updated to say that Devin Nunes is a member of House Ways and Means Committee, not the House Speaker)A recent paper published in the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) provides evidence that a decrease in the incidence of cardiovascular disease (CVD) is associated with a dramatic reduction in mortality in Western Europe. The authors hypothesize that a significant increase in mortality by the consumption of fruits, vegetables and whole grains is required for the prevention of CVD and prevention of cardiovascular disease. The increase in dietary fiber intake due to dietary fibre intake has been shown to reduce the incidence of CVD in European populations.When the United States Supreme Court legalized gay marriage in November 2010, many commentators said it was a victory for the nation, and, given that the Supreme Court's ruling came less than two months after President Bush signed the Defense of Marriage Act, that the decision would have been "a wake-up call to conservatives" in the United States. But in fact the nation has been on the losing side of the matter for several years already. On June 2, 2010, the Supreme Court ruled in Obergefell v. Hodges that the government's decision to legalize same-sex marriage in Alabama violated the Fourteenth Amendment, and in May 2011, the Court declared the decision "clearly unconstitutional."

In 2010, President Barack Obama had already made several executive orders to legalize gay marriage, and the administration's