WELCOME

The tax returns do not show any of the money

Aug. 28, 2017 by Catherine Pope

The tax returns do not show any of the money spent by the Hunters or any other individuals to support their lavish lifestyle. The IRS does not even issue a tax refund of that money to the Hunter family.

The Hunt family used a $6.5 million personal check to pay for their lavish lifestyle.

The Hunt family's tax returns show that they paid $3.2 million for their lavish lifestyle, which included dining at restaurants, parties, and shopping for their own car.

However, the family's IRS disclosure is misleading. The family's tax returns show that the Hunt had a total of $6.4 million, or about $1,450,000, spent to support their lavish lifestyle, which included vacations, spa rentals, and even a three-day visit to a spa.

The family's tax return also says the Hunt, who was born in California, is an active member of the Tea Party Freedom Caucus.

In July 2016, House Republicans held a joint committee hearing on the tax returns. The panel focused on the tax returns of former Hewlett Packard CEO Carly Fiorina, former Hewlett Packard CEO Jon Tester, and former Hewlett Packard CEO Carly Fiorina, whom the former had accused of "unethical" spending using donations from her company.

In an affidavit filed with the House Ways and Means Committee in April, former Hewlett Packard CEO Carly Fiorina accused the Obama administration of "deceptive and irresponsible tax policies that have harmed the American people."

The former Hewlett Packard CEO was in attendance at the hearing and said that there had been "no meaningful review of their [sic] tax return" and that the IRS had not released her tax returns before the hearing.

The House Ways and Means Committee asked the IRS to release the documents and interview the former Hewlett Packard CEO, but the agency refused to do so because it is not required by the law and would require the IRS to release its tax returns before a hearing.

Former Hewlett Packard CEO Jon Tester said that the company had made no substantive changes or changes to their tax return while in office, and that they had been "re-evaluating everything," but did not provide any new information.

After the hearing, the agency said the company was doing "some small changes to its tax reporting that have made it harder for taxpayers to see the information that they are required to see."

A spokesman for the IRS declined to comment on the ongoing investigation and said the agency "takes this very seriously and