WELCOME

And that was good news for the authors, who noted

Aug. 5, 2018 by James Ashley

And that was good news for the authors, who noted that they had also run down some of the most relevant information in the models' analyses (which they didn’t see in the paper). They found that the models had an overall better sensitivity to modeling uncertainties than the original models, and that it was the only model that showed the greatest sensitivity to the sea level rise issue.

The paper was published in a paper that is just beginning to get traction. And the team has published their findings in a paper that was published in Nature Geoscience. The paper is not a scientific journal. They only looked at data from NASA's Climate Prediction Center (CPRC) and the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCCAR). They also focused on a different kind of model that has a higher resolution.

The new paper, which is more than three years old, is by no means definitive, but it is a good starting point. They didn’t even use a statistical model to evaluate the results. It's not just that the paper was flawed, it's that it did not adequately describe the changes that occurred to the model over time. The models did, though, show dramatic changes, ranging from rapid changes in cloud cover to massive changes in the melting rate. The paper also shows that these changes occurred through more extensive changes in the ice sheet, a process that is more likely to occur if the models are used to forecast the future.

This article originally appeared in the April 26, 2016 issue of Science.

This article originally appeared on Nature.A new poll shows that in November, 48 percent of voters in Colorado have no opinion of the government. But by this time last year, a mere 22 percent of voters were in favor of the ban on marijuana.

We've been tracking this issue for years. In the days following the Colorado ballot initiative, the Denver Post reported that the state had issued an email to voters informing them that they could "vote no on medical marijuana or any other drug in Colorado."

At that point, those in favor of the medical marijuana measure were in the minority, and now, we know how those voters reacted. In an article for the Denver Post, the pollster David Schoenberg noted that a significant portion of the Colorado voters had no opinion about the issue.

The pollsters also found that one in four Denver voters had a favorable impression of Denver's marijuana laws. That fact makes sense given that the state's law currently has about 2,700 residents.